License $0.00
Free download
Creative Commons license
Commercial uses of this track are NOT allowed.
Adaptations of this track are NOT allowed to be shared.
You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the artist.
the ANGRY MINUTE is heard Tuesday Nights on WCCO-AM 830 Dark Star. .... .... Bush. the idiot. George W. Bush, appropriation, experimental, turntablism,
Song Info
Genre
Charts
Peak #604
Peak in subgenre #39
Author
Dave Anton
Rights
y
Uploaded
August 02, 2006
Track Files
MP3
MP3 1.9 MB • 128 kbps • 2:04
Lyrics
Well if you haven’t noticed, the new 14 YEAR OLD Emergency Contraception Pill or Morning After Pill has been dashing to the finish line of approval, like race-horse on a Floyd Landis’ latte.
The use of ECP goes all the way back to the 60’s and has been touted by the amoral pharmacy engine since 1992, as a safe course of action for emergency terminations.
And further, the American Medical Association not only supported the Morning After Pill’s safety, but also passed a resolution opposing the FDA ban on the pill. I’m sorry did I say the FDA? I meant Head of FDA Drug Chief Steven Galson, because his own staff, yes, Theee Food & Drug Administration, overwhelmingly approved the Morning After Pill for public Use, and Galson overruled his own, apparently incompetent staff. Silly Scientists.
So, why the reversal? Well, it couldn’t have anything to do with the recently released, and completely UN REPORTED findings by the The Union of Concerned Scientists & PEER Public Employees for Enviromental Responsibility. Now before you fidget with the political leanings Concerned Scientists might have, listen to the literally unconscionable findings.
• From the 6000 surveys given to scientists at your FDA,
• Three in five (60 percent) also knew of cases "where commercial interests have inappropriately induced or attempted to induce the reversal, withdrawal or modification of FDA determinations or actions." Fifty percent also felt that non-governmental interests (such as advocacy groups) had induced or attempted to induce such changes.
• Two in five (40 percent) said they could not publicly express "concerns about public health without fear of retaliation." More than a third (36 percent) did not feel they could do so even inside the confines of the agency
• Almost one in five (18 percent) responded, "I have been asked, for non-scientific reasons, to inappropriately exclude or alter technical information or my conclusions in an FDA scientific document."
• More than three in five (61 percent) knew of cases in which "Department of Health and Human Services or FDA political appointees have inappropriately injected themselves into FDA determinations or actions."
• Only half (51 percent) feel the "FDA is acting effectively to protect public health."
• Less than half (47 percent) think that the "FDA routinely provides complete and accurate information to the public."
• Less than half (49 percent) agree that "FDA leadership is as committed to product safety as it is to bringing products to the market."
• Nearly 70 percent do not believe the FDA has sufficient resources to effectively perform its mission of "protecting public health . . . and helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to improve their health."
• Less than half (44 percent) say they "respect the integrity and professionalism of FDA leadership."
• Two in five (40 percent) describe their morale as poor to extremely poor, while a mere four percent rate their morale as excellent.
• More than half (52 percent) say their personal job satisfaction has decreased over the past few years, while only 18 percent say their job satisfaction has increased.
• Less than a third (32 percent) think the agency "is moving in the right direction."
This is your FDA folks.
But I’m sure this will all blow over once the Morning After Pill gets approved. I MEAN, WHY ELSE WOULD THE F.D.A. PUT US AT SUCH GREAT RISK?
