The end of Leisure are. These songs are in agreement with all Dirks points. We feel the areas represented in all responses relate to the mechanics involved. Certain endeavors only create non-proliferated delusions in many commercial and also interspersed dichotomies. In doing so one could say the old paradigm of pluralism vs monoism (relating to the interdynamics) is relegated to dominant coherence as was eluded by historian Theodore S. Wolfson in his many accounts of pre-classic athnism and pseudo-achronistic nihilism. The tendency to exacerbate pseudo-achronistic nihilism since the late 18th century has been attributed to at least 60 % of all those involved in the recycling of Borteusian Hegemony (as opposed to the Nigel and Procter sects) and latent field mechanics. If it wasn't for this recycling, this act of foreseeable parallelism would still be in effect till this day. By a very strange coincidence, a good friend of ours, Roy Gordon, just brought this up at lunch the other day. We were talking abought the dynamics of the bilocally created fictional account of Herman C. Grathe and Dwayne Smith 'On Interdynamic Structural Demonstrations of Planetary Dominant Aspects in Cohesion to Nominally Inherent Frequencies of Specific Magnetic Origin and Special Circumstances and Relationships to Spiral System Dependencies, and Interdependent of Antigone Rising’ and he said, "Can you believe that the system established to protect the helectic center from extreme pseudo achronistic nihilism has proceeded in omitting the very likes in which it has been committed to." We also believe and have been involved with future constructed field dominance. The irony of it all. And now we have confirmed it and have given it new meaning. By instilling 'contemporary psycological evidence' we have shown that Roy and ourselves were wrong all along. The relationship doesn't exist. It never has. It predates all external data and juxtaposes Lintz's pollution coordinates. The politics involved were never meant to be more than 20 % dependent on inflationary constants, diluted by free-thinkers, casual discriminatory subjects, non-minimal partisanship and not pseudo, but actual achronistic nihilists (who strictly adhere to the groundwork laid down by Grace). In reviewing our notes on neohelectics, we could see where we made a number of errors; three, to be precise. First, we failed to see that the minimal number for any set of helectic variables cannot be more than the previous set or these will cancel each other out. Two, the mechanics involved in determining the management of these sets is inane to hierarchical post dynamics. And three, if I may borrow from Albert, that one and two are blatantly obvious. We have never been as enlightened. We have truly been set 'Free'.