Farces Wanna Mo
C: In which way you live hip-hop?
D: Probably pretty clear now, as a writer. The rapper cramming verses into a
worn notebook, the programmer painstakingly tweaking his loops and dropping
samples down onto the graph. These are the images I relate to.
Tell me about your history? How did you get where you are now?
Grammar, word origins, the question of who has time to build infrastructure, drunkenness in divorce, the fate of abandoned banks, sub-Little League baseball for minors, soft drinks, call waiting, daguerrotypes, Al Capone, Dennis Alcapone, El Cajon, eye surgery, the intellectual property theories of Stanford University Law Professor L. Lessig, sadness & sobbing, love, Gary Sandy (of WKRP fame), the successes & failures of the Prime Minister of Japan, and, well, we are only up to song 10 (of 15), but you probly get the idea . . .
Have you performed live in front of an audience? Any special memories?
Where? Do you like it? Any special moments?
No. n/a. n/a. Yes.
Your musical influences
Mejores bandas del momento...
Eudean: Neal Stephenson. Farces Wanna Mo es lo que Steely Dan podría haber sido si ellos fueran una banda de garage.
Dave W.: Daniel Johnston. The Art of Noise. Half Japanese. La historia de Half Japanese, llamada "The Band That Would Be King" esta disponible ahora en DVD. Es una película donde es duro decidir entre la versión del director y la versión regular. Las mejores bandas no están tocando: The Fall, The Minutemen.
What equipment do you use?
How could a band that recorded twelve records between 1990 and 2002 take three years on a follow up? Maybe we got depressed about nine-eleven. Or maybe, just maybe, the ready availability of radical new recording expedients like T-Racks, Audiotools, Acid WAV, Internet Audio Mix and all the rest of those wonderful tools from the brief magical moment of cheap downloadable software primed our ambitions and pumped our ability to bring it all across.
Anything else?
To the extent that specific publications are discussed above in this Background section, these discussions should not be taken as an admission that the discussed publications (e. g., patents) are prior art for patent law purposes. For example, some or all of the discussed publications may not be sufficiently early in time, may not reflect subject matter developed early enough in time and/or may not be sufficiently enabling so as to amount to prior art for patent law purposes.
